Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0955

reference
655-tree-1
name
0955
tree-preservation-order

undefined

655-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.013493 50.867474)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.013464 50.867471,-1.013465 50.867477,-1.013469 50.867482,-1.013483 50.867489,-1.013501 50.867489,-1.013509 50.867486,-1.013520 50.867477,-1.013521 50.867472,-1.013520 50.867466,-1.013516 50.867461,-1.013502 50.867454,-1.013484 50.867454,-1.013476 50.867457,-1.013470 50.867461,-1.013464 50.867471)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL